SAMPLE ESSAYS BAND 7 + FOR IELTS WRITING TASK 2 HARD TOPICS

It is undoubtedly the case that the world today has become a global village. One of the effects of this is that increasingly people in all comers of the world are exposed to similar services and products and adopt similar habits. My view is that this is largely a beneficial process and in this essay I will explain why.

The first point to make is that there are some downsides to this process of cultural globalization, but these are relatively minor. The most significant of these disadvantages is that it can weaken national culture and traditions. For example, if people watch films and television programmes produced in the United States, sometimes they adopt aspects of the lifestyle of the American characters they see on television. Typically, however, this only affects minor details such as clothing and does not seriously threaten national identity.

When we turn to the other side of the argument, there are two major points to make in favour of this process. The first of these is that the more we share habits, products and services, the better we understand each other and this reduces prejudice against other nations. The other point relates to modernity'. It is a sign of progress in a society' that people no longer are restricted to brands and advertisements from their own society but are able to access more international goods. If, for example, there were unable to drink Coca Cola or wear Nike, then that would mean their society was not part of the international community'.

In conclusion, I understand the point of view of people who worry about cultural globalization because it is a threat to national traditions. However, this is outweighed by its positive impact on international understanding and the fact that it represents progress within a society.

Words: 298

The role of arts in modem life is unique, providing people with entertainment and yielding various psychological rewards, such as relief from stress. Despite these benefits, the arts have been taken as luxury goods in many cases. It is suggested that public money of a city should be concentrated in projects like public facilities, which are more likely to bring immediate benefits to the public, rather than the arts. There are a number of facts indicating that this position is right.

Public facilities, widely accepted as one of the main precursors to a city's development, should be one of the highest priorities. Those underdeveloped cities in particular, should direct sufficient funding toward public facilities. While municipal office buildings, courthouses and post offices are essential components of public services, libraries, hospitals, parks, playing fields, gymnasiums and swimming pools are available to the public for social, educational, athletic and cultural activities. By boosting spending on public facilities, cities are more capable to satisfy the needs of citizens and improve their standard of living.

In addition to social benefits, there are economic merits that public facilities can offer to communities. An integrated transport network (maritime, land and inland waterways transport and civil aviation I, for example, promises the smooth and speedy movement of goods and people in a city. Industrial products, as well as agricultural produce of a city, can be delivered to other cities in exchange for steady income, of equal importance are public Internet facilities. Providing access to information by improving Internet and other telecommunications facilities has relevance to the ease with which businesses in a city receive, process, utilize, and send information. It is no exaggeration to say that entrepreneurs, either from home or abroad, will first examine the infrastructure of a city before deciding whether to pursue business opportunities there.

The arts, by comparison, although enabling people to see the world and the human condition differently and to see a truth one might ignore before, do not merit government spending. The first reason is that the arts referring to music, film and literature altogether are more likely to attract the investment of the private sector than public facilities. Businesspeople continue to invest in the arts in the expectation of earning lump sum income and the arts in return, continue to flourish without the government spending. Meanwhile, the

arts are a key component of a culture and naturally passed down from one generation to another. Unlike public facilities, they require no money to survive.

It is therefore dear that construction of public facilities should be given the foremost consideration. The concern about the well-being of individual citizens and that of a city is more acute than the apprehension about the survival and prospects of the arts, something that businesses have a stake in.

Words: 463

There is a common belief that it is students' responsibility to take care of their own tuition fees since they study for themselves, not for the good of society. In my opinion, this idea is completely absurd from every perspective.

From one standpoint, I believe that undergraduates should not have to pay the full cost of education. This would be too expensive, especially in the UK or the US, hence deterring many young people from pursuing tertiary education. It is because many talented students are the victims of their families' financial predicament, which prevents them from furthering their study. Furthermore, the provision of exemptions and scholarships for high achievers would motivate competent individuals to work hard during their college time. If there were no encouragement in terms of finance, they would feel unappreciated and demotivated.

In addition, I think society does gain benefits from university undergraduates; therefore, it is reasonable to offer financial aids to those students. Apparently, they dictate the future of a country since they would become the main workforce after graduation. Without them, the entire economy would be destabilized owing to the lack of skilled labor. On top of that, university graduates make tremendous contributions to the prosperity of their community by paying taxes when they work. Because of this, society could not deny its obligation to party assist students with their education cost.

In conclusion, I strongly oppose the idea that society gains nothing from college students and that they should settle their own study fees at university.

Words: 252

No one can argue that education is a valuable asset for an individual in this competitive employment world. It becomes a controversial discussion about whether a person should learn practical skills by himself or study with an instructor, which could provide an effective result. Both views will be discussed below.

To begin with, some people who believe in self- study have several reasons. Firstly, since the technology has become very' easy to access, learners are able to explore a wide range of information in various types of materials. There is no obstacle in the way of self-study anymore. Secondly, after people have passed several years in education, most adults become more mature and motivated on their studies and engage in self-learning by themselves. Apparently, many students who study foreigner languages, study on their own through websites or join mutual- support groups, in which case, no educators are involved at all.

On the other hand, some opponents argue that studying in schools or institutions with high-qualified teachers and following an educational system help students to indulge into all aspects quickly and gain a better result than self-study. This is because, most qualified teachers would know what materials should apply in different student levels and know how to guide students to achieve the best result effectively, which cannot find from self-study. Moreover, having a teacher’s guide ensures that a student will achieve a certificate or a degree, which is required in targeted employment area.

To sum up, in my opinion, If a person is able to control himself to study on tract constantly and intensively, self- study will be suit him the most, perhaps if a person wants to get a greater result, coaching from teachers will be useful for him.

Words: 289

Films and TV game shows entertain our life, helping US relieve pressure from work and study. They become a part which can not be separated from our life in this way. Accordingly, some people think that buying foreign-made movies and TV programmes is worth encouraging. However, others argue that it would be much better if a nation can produce its own movies or TV channels. In this essay, I will lend more details to the two sides of this issue before arriving at my conclusion.

Spiritual values are often regarded as the first reason as to why some nations import and broadcast foreign films and TV programmes. Making films is the way for each director to introduce as well as widely spread images of their nation and people to international watchers. To put it more simply, cinematic works convey messages about friendship, love and life, all of which open a new horizon to viewers. Watchers, therefore, can broaden cultural knowledge about neighbor countries through movies or TV channels. For film importers, they themselves also reap a lot of benefits from this. They will learn film-making techniques from leading entertainment companies to produce their first works.

However, the idea that nations should develop their own leisure industry' rather than depend on externa] factors is not quite groundless. What if domestic cinemas only project movies imported from overseas because of the lack of domestic producers’ works? li is easily predicted that watchers will find hard to stay immune from influences of externa] culture. For example, young people tend to buy foreign goods if they are forced to watch foreign films or game shows. In long run, there will be no room for local products in customers’ mind.

In my opinion, each country' should have their own entertainment channels because this helps domestic producers to promote culture both locally and internationally. This will also lead to long-term benefits in terms of tourism and economy.

Words: 321